Measuring Security for Energy Infrastructure
A Framework for Generation, Transmission, and Substation Resilience
Architecture
Security Is Determined by How Defense Is Structured
Security effectiveness for energy infrastructure depends on how detection, tracking, and identification layers are structured across generation sites, transmission corridors, substations, and distribution nodes as threats move closer to consequence.
Architecture is more than the placement of sensors around a single site. It defines whether high-consequence equipment, control buildings, and grid interconnection points are defended as an integrated environment, especially across large footprints and dispersed assets like solar arrays and wind farms.
Security architecture is what creates defensible energy infrastructure.
Methodology
Defense Maturity Is Cumulative Across Ordered Layers
Effective protection is achieved through sequential layers of defense, each increasing the difficulty of interference as threats move through the environment toward critical grid assets and operational continuity.
To build resilience, each ordered layer must increase both the quality and coverage of detection, tracking, and identification as threats move closer to generation equipment, substation yards, and control systems.
This cumulative approach ensures that no single sensor limitation results in loss of situational awareness and guards against known failure modes across wide-area, mixed-terrain, and remote operating environments.
This is the foundation of Cumulative Defense Strategy.
Measurement
Mathematical and Objective Consistency
If defensive difficulty does not increase as threats move closer to high-consequence grid assets, resilience cannot be claimed or measured. Compliance checks and demonstrations show capability; they do not demonstrate operational resilience.
Measurement evaluates whether detection, tracking, and identification performance measurably improves across site perimeters, access zones, equipment yards, and approach paths under real operating conditions, not controlled tests.
Without measurable improvement, maturity cannot be assumed and investment cannot be justified.
Cumulative Defense Strategy excerpt from ASCE 78-24
Application
Architecture Responds to Gaps That Measurement Exposes
Security architecture is modified where performance fails to improve across ordered defense layers protecting generation sites, substations, storage yards, and critical grid nodes.
Measurement identifies precisely where layers are insufficient, misaligned, or redundant, allowing investment to be applied only where it produces measurable risk reduction whether the environment is a remote wind facility, a large solar field, or a dense substation footprint.
This approach replaces technology-driven deployments with outcome-driven design, while maintaining cost optimization across complex, distributed energy operating environments.
Cost-to-benefit calculations are part of the measurable outcome.
All Content © 2025 Surveillance One, Inc. | AL | AZ | CA | CO | CT | DC | DE | FL | GA | HI | ID | IL | IN | IA | KS | KY | LA | ME | MD | MA | MI | MN | MO | NE | NV | NJ | NM | NY | NC | ND | OH | OK | OR | PA | RI | SC | TN | TX LIC #B10520701 | UT | VA | WA | WV | WI | WY
National Corporate HQ
3000 Airport Dr, Suite 405
Erie, CO 80516




